“His technique surpassed human ability.”
“This is exactly how ****** Sensei did it. We want to do it exactly as he did.”
“Nobody can ever equal ******* Sensei.”
“My karate teacher’s teacher was the best ever, that’s why our system is the best!”
“******* was unbeatable.”
“He was a living kami.”
“If he says it works, it must work.”
Teachers who can’t be questioned, for whatever reason, are dangerous to their students and themselves. They seem to inexorably fall into the trap of believing their own propaganda. It happens all the time, in all sorts of arts. As soon as students start going along with whatever sensei does because sensei’s technique is the ultimate, the perfect, the divinely inspired (take your pick), teachers are trapped in an ugly downward spiral.
The problem for the teacher is that since their students always go along with sensei’s technique, the sensei stops getting honest feedback with regard to their training and teaching. As a result, the teacher’s technique inevitably begins to deteriorate. They can’t avoid it. Any time their technique wasn't right they would feel more resistance, which would tell them they need to sharpen fundamental practice and technique. When their students always go with the flow, the sensei never gets that feedback, and therefore never experiences a technique working less than perfectly. As a result, the sensei has no way to know if their skills are sharp or dull.
The result is the teacher’s technique gradually becomes duller and duller. However, this can’t be blamed entirely on the teacher. The students are lying to themselves and their teacher about the quality of the techniques. Without opportunities to train with people who recognize a teacher’s imperfections, the only possible result is a slow deterioration of the teacher’s skills.
This is sad for the teachers and the students.
There is a phenomenon in martial arts of students deifying teachers. It can happen in any art with superlative practitioners and teachers. In the world of Japanese budo I’ve seen it in both gendai and koryu arts, and it’s a sad phenomenon no matter where it happens. Budo teachers are human, maybe especially human.
To be a martial arts teacher is to have a high degree of skill. Being skilled at martial arts means possessing a certain type of power. Those with skill are seen as being able to subdue, control, or just plain beat into the ground anyone who threatens them. A few people with bad attitudes and/or impulse control problems are even seen as being dangerous to just about anyone because they won’t wait to be threatened. They’ll pick the fight just because they are confident they can do it without getting hurt themselves.
As a kid growing up, the power to physically subdue someone, or pound them into the ground, was a very attractive power. I was a skinny kid with allergies and not a clue how to relate to other people, so I was picked on. A lot. I didn’t realize it then, but later I figured out that I caused a lot of the issues just by being so socially inept. That doesn’t make the schoolyard abuse any better, and while I was going through it I fantasized about having the superpower of being unbeatable. It was a wonderful daydream.
The temptation to revel in power is strong. I understand that temptation. When I started training Kodokan Judo in college, the realization that I was becoming good at grappling was shocking, and the temptation to abuse this ability was powerful. In my case, my friends and sempai were more than happy to remind me that I was thoroughly human and quite beatable. As I moved through the kyu ranks, it was easy to idolize my teacher and attribute more than normal wisdom to him. He was very human though, and he never implied that anything he did was perfect or that we should blindly copy his technique or his life.
When I see students of any teacher proclaim that their teacher’s way is absolutely correct and that one should not deviate from the teacher’s example even a little, I worry about those students and that teacher’s legacy. When students start idolizing a teacher and idealizing the teachings, I can only see bad things happening. A teacher who is never questioned and never challenged in any way is trapped. That teacher can’t sharpen their skills by practicing with their students.
Teachers need challenges as much as any student. Any teacher worthy of respect looks for things and people who will challenge their technique. That’s how we all progress and improve. We try something we can’t do, and we work at it until we can. The best budoka don’t discourage students from giving them puzzles to solve and difficulties to refine their technique against - people like Kano Jigoro and Kunii Zen’ya come to mind. Most of us are not undefeated legends like Kunii Zen’ya, but I’ve seen lots of teachers challenge themselves and ask their students to help them stay challenged.
I remember being at a seminar with some of the top people in the art we were training, folks who could make a strong case for being the best in the world at what they did. The most senior teacher there chose me to be his uke when he wanted to demonstrate a strangle using a weapon. He reached in, placed the weapon and applied the strangle. I didn’t tap. His technique wasn’t working. It’s not that the technique was bad, just his application of it at that moment. It was a technique he demonstrated fairly regularly at seminars, and I think people had been tapping out for him just because of his status. I’m too stupid to do that, so I just sat there. Sensei stepped back, looked at me a moment, adjusted his technique and the strangle got better. He played around with it for a few seconds more, the strangle sank in and I tapped. He never said anything about my failure to immediately tap. Some of his students seemed a little horrified that I had embarrassed Sensei with my behavior. He never said a word, but after that, whenever I was present, he called on me to be his uke for that technique demonstration.
I think he appreciated that he had to do the technique absolutely correctly on me. I didn’t give him a pass just because he was so much senior to me and in general one of the finest technicians I’ve ever seen. With me, he knew he would get an honest reaction to his technique, so he could tell how well he was doing it. People who just go with whatever technique you are trying to do will ruin your technique. Anyone who wants to stay technically sharp has to be challenged regularly. I don’t mean they have to do challenge matches. Rather, they need situations where they have to fully engage to be sure their technique will work.
A martial artist who isn’t open to partners who challenge their technique isn’t going to be able to maintain that technique for long and will end up relying on students to take the fall or tap out from the technique. This isn’t good for the teacher or the students. The teachers find their technique slowly degrading from the lack of a stone to sharpen it on. The students have to lose respect for their teacher as they realize that the only reason his technique works is because they let it.
It took a child to call out the emperor when he was naked. No teacher worthy of the title deserves to be put in a situation where someone can call them out because their students haven’t been giving them honest practice.
Special thanks to Deborah Klens-Bigman, PhD. for making this smooth and readable with her excellent editing skills.
Even monkeys fall from trees
ReplyDeleteMy instructor was a defensive tactics instructor for Uncle Sam's Misguided Children. As related to me...He was demonstrating that with hands raised, you can turn faster than someone can thrust a knife. He'd done it a thousand times! After handing the Ka-Bar to the recruit he turned his back to him and moved the point against his own back. He then said "When I move my hand, you run that knife through, You understand?" He then went to put his hands up into the "starting" position. The recruit did exactly as told... my instructor stayed conscious long enough to exclaim to the medics. "Don't do anything to the kid! He did exactly what I told him!"
Best lesson in complacency he ever learned.
It's worth bearing in mind that no matter how good someone is technically, they can always be beaten. It's why weapons were invented.
ReplyDeleteSo if you had, say, a gymnastics coach of a very advanced age you wouldn't do anything she said because she can't even touch her toes?
ReplyDeleteFunny to claim one should only train under someone that can always beat you.
It's only right that an absolute gorilla of a 30 year old should try to beat up his frail 90 year old Sensei. For if the Sensei can't handle it what could Sensei possibly have of value to share?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous,
ReplyDeleteHaving a partner who challenges your technique is quite different the fighting challenge matches. My teachers have their technique challenged all the time. By this I mean that when they go to apply a technique, uke provides resistance to the technique so the teacher can see what is working, find ways to improve their technique and perhaps even discover new things about the technique and principles involved. "Challenging their technique" does not require squaring off and fighting. (I have seen that too. I watched 80+ year old Suda Sensei drive a very strong, skilled young man right off the floor in kendo. Age should not be assumed to mean frailty.)
The Budo Bum,
ReplyDeleteLook at other arts (such as gymnastics) where the coach/Sensei can't do ANY of the techniques she is expecting the students to do. It's the knowledge and understanding of the Sensei we try to emulate not their ability to beat others up.
Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteI don't know about that. My ballet teacher in college was in her 70's and she could kick our butts on the dance floor. I think it is important for a teacher in budo to maintain and increase their skills as they age. That doesn't mean we don't lose a step here and there, and it doesn't mean we don't lose some strength over time. It does mean that we keep training and learning and refining our techniques and skills. What is being refined is the highest levels of understanding and application. I expect a 75 year old budo teacher to be working on becoming more subtle and using less strength all the time. My teachers all do this. This isn't gymnastics. Practice is an important part of the learning and teaching processes. I would question any budo teacher who didn't continue to practice to the fullest of their ability.
How long would you have expected Cus D'Amato to last against Mike Tyson, Floyd Patterson, or Jose Torres? (Yes, some people reach a magical level - Ueshiba Sensei comes to mind - but most of us are "normal": we struggle against the ravages of time but little by little we only lose.)
ReplyDeleteNot only could D'Amato train boxers to an elite level he could tutor others to become successful boxing trainers themselves.
Expecting the elderly to able to match or surpass others has little to do with anything except as some Freudian desire for "parents" to never die.