I
have to say this. I believe that the effectiveness of a martial art
should be judged not by what the most gifted practitioner of the art can
do with it, but by what the least gifted practitioner can do with it.
When
people talk about how great a martial art is, the reference point used
is almost always what the very greatest of practitioners of the art can
do. These are inevitably fabulous and gifted martial artists. In
general they can do incredible things I will never be able to dream of
doing. I’ve felt this level of skill first hand. Judo is one of the
arts I study, and it because it is an Olympic sport, who is the very
best of the best among the competitors is not open to argument. I’ve
had the good fortune to train with Olympians and world champions. I
know what their skills and arts feel like (they are almost undetectable,
they are generally so subtle you only realize you’ve been thrown when
your back hits the floor).
The
vast majority of us don’t have their gifts of speed, dexterity and
sensitivity. I’ve seen that the very finest of martial artists, whether
the art in question has a competitive sport or not, exhibit these same
gifts of speed, dexterity and sensitivity, whether the art is unarmed or
armed. What this gets to is, if we compare martial arts by
comparing what the most gifted practitioners can do, we may well only be
comparing who is the most gifted, and not which art has the most to
give.
A
lot of people talk about which martial art can beat another in a
head-to-head match up. To me, that’s rather pointless, because such
head-to-head match ups never happen. What I want to know, what really
interests and excites me, is what can a martial art do for an average to
below-average practitioner? You know, someone like me. This is where
things get interesting, because now the foe isn’t some other highly
trained martial artists, it’s our own clumsiness.
What
will studying the martial art do for me? I already know it won’t make
me an unbeatable fighter. No amount of training is going to do that for
me. I don’t have the gifts. But training will do other things for me.
Will it increase my sensitivity? Will it improve my timing? Will I
gain a mastery of spacing? Am I likely to collect a lot of injuries
while training in this particular art? WIll I enjoy the time I spend
training and feel like it is benefiting me, not just on physical level,
but also on a mental level? Will I learn coherent principles that can
be applied across the spectrum of encounters, and not just a bunch of
discrete techniques that can only be used in situations very similar to
the ones they are taught in?
Considering
these questions one at a time, here is what I get. “Will it improve my
timing?” This is a good one that people don’t give enough
consideration to, in my opinion. “Timing is everything” goes the old
line, and that is certainly true in the martial arts. I’ve seen over
the years that the most accomplished, most effective artists, whether in
a sportive art such as kendo or judo, or in kata art such as kenjutsu
or jojutsu, are the ones with the best timing. They attack when the
conditions are optimum. They don’t waste energy, when the opening
occurs, they are there. They move with their opponents and hit their
targets with timing rather than speed. I’ve seen octogenarians
completely dominate people in their teens and twenties because they
understood timing. They matched their movements with their partner’s
movements and timed them so they slipped naturally into place.
This
brings up the next question. “Will it improve my sensitivity?”
Sensitivity includes awareness of a broad range of things. From the
closest, feeling and understanding your partner through their touch
where they are holding you or your clothes, to your awareness of the
world around you and the people in it. At the closest level, I teach
students to be aware of their partners even when their eyes are closed,
so they can understand and affect their partner through touch without looking at them
or the point they are targeting. From there sensitivity stretches out
to being aware of how someone is going to move and what they are going
to do based on understanding the clues in their posture and movement.
This requires a visual sensitivity first focused on your partner, and
later, as you improve, extending to everything in your awareness. If
all you learn to focus on it how to strike or how to see one opponent
after they are declared, you aren’t learning very much. If you are
becoming sensitive to the world around you, you are really learning
something worthwhile.
“Will
I gain a mastery of spacing?” This is a great one, because if you can
control the spacing between you and a partner, you control the entire
encounter. By controlling the spacing, you can limit a partner’s
options and even choose what options to give them. It’s tough to learn
about controlling spacing at a range of distances from just one art
though. Most arts are very strong at one or two distances. I study
Kodokan Judo, which is great at the most intimate distances, the range
where you can reach out and hold someone. If you practice some of the
kata you can learn about slightly longer distances, the range of hand
strikes. It’s starts to fall down at kicking ranges and is really bad
at weapons ranges. Shinto Muso Ryu Jo is great at a variety of armed
ranges, but it has little to offer at the range of touch. You can’t
learn everything at once, and I wouldn’t expect one art to teach you
everything. But whatever you are studying, it should spend a lot of
time in partner practice so you can learn about spacing. I’m not
talking just about sparring, but partner practice, which includes a lot
of slow, careful, thoughtful practice so you can internalize lessons
about spacing without developing bad habits.
“Am
I likely to collect a lot of injuries while training in this particular
art?” This should be a no brainer, but we forget about it quite often.
Is the training atmosphere a safe one? Are these people that I want
to be around? Every physical activity has risks (know any basketball
players who’ve had knee surgery?) but the risks should not be
excessive. I have friends who have left dojo because of the way training
was run. Usually the problem is not with the art but with the way
training is done. Be aware of this. The people you train with have a
huge impact on the value you will get from your training and how much
you learn. If they don’t respect you physically, you could end up badly
damaged with injuries that cause lifelong problems. If people don’t
respect you as a person, you have to deal with not just physical risks,
but with the emotional wear and tear of being treated badly as an
individual. Not all injuries are physical. Make sure the particular
art in the particular place you are training is safe for you and those
around you.
“WIll
I enjoy the time I spend training and feel like it is benefiting me,
not just on physical level, but also on a mental level?” Training takes
effort and motivation. If you don’t feel like you are benefiting,
you’re not going to want to do it. Good training should leave you
tired, and honestly, exhilarated. The effects should enrich your body
through the exercise, your skills through the technical training, and
your mind through the broader application of what you are learning. If
you aren’t getting all three, you might want to rethink what you are
doing. I know that when I leave a good training session, I may be so
exhausted I can hardly walk, but mentally I am much more alive and
aware, and emotionally I am, exhilarated. The training stretches my
physical skills and mental awareness so that everything functions at a
higher level. This extends to my emotions as well. This is one of the
big reasons I love training. It just feels so good at every level.
This
is the difference between a coherent art and just a random collection
of stuff. “Will I learn coherent principles that can be applied across
the spectrum of encounters, and not just a bunch of discrete techniques
that can only be used in situations very similar to the ones they are
taught in?” A lot of people argue over whether something is a “jutsu
術” or a “Do 道”. That’s not really a useful question, but I’ve already
written about it here.
The question to ask should be, “Is this based on coherent principles
that can be applied beyond the discrete techniques being taught, or it
just a collection of techniques? The best arts and teachers use
techniques as pointers towards principles rather than as an end in
themselves. If you are studying throws, do you learn how off-balancing
and over-extending contributes to instability in a partner and how this
makes powerful throws effortless and effective? If you are studying
striking, do you learn how to move your hips and lower body to develop
power that can be applied to not only strikes but other movements as
well? If you are studying joint locks, are you learning the principles
behind locking the joints to prevent movement, or are you just learning
to twist the wrist *this way* so it hurts? The art should teach
principles that cross all of these areas and can be applied
strategically and tactically as well. Lessons from throwing will apply
to striking, while striking lessons apply to joint locks and lessons
about locking the body apply to throwing. The system should be coherent
and the principles effective across the range of activity.
All
of these things are essential to making a worthwhile art in my eyes.
If what you are training isn’t giving you all of these, you aren’t
getting the most possible out of your art, and the art doesn’t do very
much for the people studying it. Which art is most effective is the one
that does the best job of teaching you the above. Not every art is
ideally suited for every person. We each bring our own strengths and
weaknesses to our training. The best art will reinforce your strengths
and help you overcome weaknesses. It will develop your sensitivity,
timing and mastery of spacing. Your body will be strengthened and
energized by your training, and your mind will be polished. You will
feel better physically, mentally and emotionally after training. You
will gain skills and understanding that apply far beyond mere physical
confrontations.
If you’re not getting all of these from your training, you’re not studying the most effective martial art.
3 comments:
Thoughtful post, Peter. Having practiced at various times Kodokan judo, Shotokan karate, aikido, and iaido, I have a similar perspective on the arts. When I was younger, I was more interested in the fighting aspects, but now, in my mid-60's, I have not much interest in that. Martial arts are to me more about myself. Thanks for your thoughts.
Bravo on an excellent, insightful post.
Post a Comment